Important message board posts about the Kaitlyn Arquette case, with responses from Kaitís mother, Lois Duncan Arquette:
TIP FROM AN INSIDER:
Sun Aug 11
2002:† Two key figures that have not been
questioned are two
THE KILLER WAS A COP:
Wed Jul 31 2002: †I am currently a private investigator in
Judging from the picture of the bullet hole in Kait's car, (and this is just a picture and not a detailed one), I would have to say that she was run off the road and the killer exited the vehicle and fired the shots into the car while standing behind her. This is based on the height of the bullet hole and the apparent angle of strike.
Now here is the kicker -- The killer was a police officer. This is based again on the angle of strike and placement of the bullet hole. For the bullet to strike at this angle position the killer would have been standing behind Kait just in the exact place a police officer would be trained to stand when effecting a traffic stop and holding a gun as only a police officer would have been trained to do so. The killer was a police officer, you can take that FACT to the bank. I'll bet anybody my life on it.
Response:† There is evidence to support that startling theory:
(1) There was unexplained rear-end damage to Kait's car, as if the car was hit from behind. †Police shrugged it off as "old damage," but that car was registered in our name, and know for a fact that the damage was not there when Kait left our home that evening.
(2) We've been contacted by a witness from out-of-state, who
The officer this woman saw could not have been Det. Merriman, as Merriman was off-duty, in plain clothes, driving an unmarked car. Merriman also contends that he never went to the driver's side. There is nothing in Kait's case file to indicate the existence of this uniformed officer, who was apparently at the scene before anyone else.
This witness appears to be credible.† Our P.I. has confirmed that the witness was,